I’m a labour economist, a President of the Board at the Institute for Structural Research (IBS), Warsaw, Poland, and a Research Fellow at IZA, Bonn, and RWI, Essen, Germany.

About me

I’m a labour economist and a President of the Board at the Institute for Structural Research (IBS), Warsaw, Poland, and a Research Fellow at the IZA, Bonn, and RWI Essen, Germany. My research interests include the impact of technological progress on labour markets, structural and occupational change, job quality, and minimum wage, as well as labour market and social effects of climate and energy policies.

Since 2016, I’ve co-organised the Jobs and Development Conference.

In 2004, I started a music webzine PopUp. I have acted as its editor, music journalist, and photographer for a dozen years or so.

Info

Name:Piotr Lewandowski
Email:contact@piotr-lewandowski.pl

Piotr Lewandowski is a labour economist, a President of the Board at Institute for Structural Research (IBS), Warsaw, Poland, and a Research Fellow at IZA, Bonn, Germany.

About me

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aenean euismod bibendum laoreet. Proin gravida dolor sit amet lacus accumsan et viverra justo commodo. Proin sodales pulvinar sic tempor. Sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Nam fermentum, nulla luctus pharetra vulputate, felis tellus mollis orci, sed rhoncus pronin sapien nunc accuan eget.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aenean euismod bibendum laoreet.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aenean euismod bibendum laoreet.

Info

Name:Piotr Lewandowski
Email:contact@piotr-lewandowski.pl
Phone:+48 123 345 678
Publications
Date: Authors:
Authors:
Piotr Lewandowski
Katarzyna Lipowska
Mateusz Smoter
Publications category:
Share:
Preference for working from home – subjective perceptions of COVID-19 matter more than objective information on occupational exposure to contagion
Published in:

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics

We investigate how subjective and objective assessment of COVID-19 risks affect preferences toward working from home (WFH). We conducted a discrete choice experiment combined with an information provision experiment with more than 11 000 workers in Poland. Estimating willingness to pay for WFH, we find that the subjective assessment of COVID-19 risk matters more than objective occupational exposure. Informing workers about occupational exposure to contagion generally does not affect preferences toward WFH.
Date: Authors:
Authors:
Piotr Lewandowski
Karol Madoń
Deborah Winkler
Publications category:
Share:
The role of Global Value Chains for worker tasks and wage inequality
Published in:

Accepted in The World Economy

We study the relationship between global value chain (GVC) participation, worker-level routine task intensity, and wage inequality within countries. Using survey data from 34 countries and instrumenting for GVC participation, we find that higher GVC participation is associated with more routine-intensive work, especially among workers in offshorable occupations. This indirectly widens within-country wage inequality. However, GVC participation directly contributes to reduced wage inequality, except in the richest countries. Overall, GVC participation is negatively associated with wage inequality in most low- and middle-income countries that receive offshored jobs, and positively in high-income countries that offshore jobs.
Date: Authors:
Authors:
Myrielle Gonschor
Ronald Bachmann
Karol Madoń
Piotr Lewandowski
Publications category:
Share:
The impact of robots on labour market transitions in Europe
Published in:

Structural Change and Economic Dynamics

We study the effects of robot exposure on worker flows in 16 European countries between 1998-2017. Overall, we find small negative effects on job separations and small positive effects on job findings. We detect significant cross-country differences and find that labour costs are a major driver: the effects of robot exposure are generally larger in absolute terms in countries with relatively low or average levels of labour costs than in countries with high levels of labour costs.
Date: Authors:
Authors:
Maciej Albinowski
Piotr Lewandowski
Publications category:
Share:
The impact of ICT and robots on labour market outcomes of demographic groups in Europe
Published in:

Labour Economics

We study the age- and gender-specific labour market effects of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and robots in 14 European countries between 2010-2018. Using IV regressions we show that they increased the shares of young and prime-aged women in employment and in the wage bills of particular sectors, but reduced the shares of older women and prime-aged men.
Date: Authors:
Authors:
Zuzanna Kowalik
Piotr Lewandowski
Tomasz Geodecki
Maciej Grodzicki
Publications category:
Share:
Automation In Shared Service Centres: Implications For Skills And Autonomy In A Global Organisation
We study implications of automation of routine cognitive work in shared service centres (SSCs) in Poland. Drawing on 31 in-depth interviews, we highlight the negotiated nature of automation processes shaped by interactions between headquarters, SSCs, and their workers. Workers actively participated in automation processes, eliminating the most mundane tasks. This resulted in upskilling, higher job satisfaction and empowerment. Yet, this depends upon the fact that automation is triggered by labour shortages limit the labour-intensive expansion of SSCs.
Date: Authors:
Authors:
Karina Doorley
Jan Gromadzki
Piotr Lewandowski
Dora Tuda
Philippe Van Kerm
Publications category:
Share:
Automation and income inequality in Europe
We study the effects of robot penetration on household income inequality in 14 European countries between 2006–2018. We find that, similarly to the United States, automation reduced relative hourly wages and employment of directly affected European demographic groups. We then use the estimated wage and employment shocks as input to the EUROMOD microsimulation model to assess how robot-driven shocks affected household income inequality. Automation had tiny effects on income inequality. Transfers played a key role in cushioning the transmission of these shocks to household incomes.